12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging and MRS.

      Nmr in Biomedicine
      Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, therapeutic use, Breast Neoplasms, drug therapy, pathology, surgery, Diffusion, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, methods, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Middle Aged, Neoadjuvant Therapy, ROC Curve, Remission Induction, Tumor Burden, Young Adult

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to determine whether tumor size, MRS parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements could be applied to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Ninety patients with breast cancer (median size, 4.5 cm; range, 1.6-9.5 cm) were evaluated with single-voxel ¹H MRS and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Diffusion-weighted imaging was performed in 41 of these patients using a 1.5-T scanner before and after completion of NAC. Pre- and post-treatment measurements and changes in tumor size, MRS parameters [absolute and normalized total choline-containing compound (tCho) integral and tCho signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)] and ADCs in pCR versus non-pCR were compared using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance of each parameter. After NAC, 30 patients (33%) showed pCR and 60 (67%) showed non-pCR. At pretreatment, ADC was the only significant parameter in differentiating between pCR and non-pCR [(0.83 ± 0.05) × 10⁻³ versus (0.97 ± 0.14) × 10⁻³ mm²/s] (p = 0.014). Post-treatment measurements after completion of NAC and changes in tumor size (both p < 0.001), MRS parameters (p = 0.027 and p = 0.020 for absolute tCho integral, p = 0.036 and p = 0.023 for normalized tCho integral, and p = 0.032 and p = 0.061 for tCho SNR) and ADC (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001) were significantly different between the pCR and non-pCR groups, except for changes in tCho SNR. In ROC analysis, the areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of 0.63-0.73 were obtained for tumor size and MRS parameters. AUCs for pre- and post-treatment ADC and changes in ADC were 0.75, 0.80 and 0.96, respectively. The optimal cut-off of the percentage change in ADC for predicting pCR was 40.7%, yielding 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity. Patients with pCR showed significantly lower pretreatment ADCs than those with non-pCR. The change in ADC after NAC was the most accurate predictor of pCR. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content205

          Cited by20