219
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Improving GHB withdrawal with baclofen: study protocol for a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          GHB (gamma-hydroxybutyrate) and its pro-drugs GBL (gamma-butyrolactone) and 1,4-butanediol (1,4-BD) are central nervous system depressants whose street names include ‘G’ and ‘liquid ecstasy’. They are used recreationally predominately for their stimulant and pro-sexual effects or for sedation to help with sleep and/or to ‘come down’ after using stimulant recreational drugs. Although overall population prevalence is low (0.1 %), in some groups such as men who have sex with men, GHB/GBL use may reach 20 %. GHB/GBL dependence may be associated with severe withdrawal with individuals presenting either acutely to emergency departments or to addiction services for support. Benzodiazepines are currently prescribed for GHB/GBL detoxification but do not prevent all complications, such as behavioural disinhibition, that may require hospitalisation or admission to a high dependency/intensive care unit. The GABA B receptor mediates most effects of GHB/GBL and the GABA B agonist, baclofen, has shown promise as an adjunct to benzodiazepines in reducing withdrawal severity when prescribed both during withdrawal and as a 2-day ‘preload’ prior to detoxification. The key aim of this feasibility study is provide information about recruitment and characteristics of the proposed outcome measure (symptom severity, complications including delirium and treatment escalation) to inform an application for a definitive randomised placebo controlled trial to determine the role of baclofen in the management of GHB/GBL withdrawal and whether starting baclofen 2 days earlier improves outcomes further.

          Methods/design

          This is a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled feasibility study that will recruit participants (aged over 18 years) who are GHB/GBL-dependent and wish to undergo planned GHB/GBL detoxification or are at risk of acute withdrawal and are inpatients requiring unplanned withdrawal. We aim to recruit 88 participants: 28 unplanned inpatients and 60 planned outpatients.

          During detoxification we will compare baclofen 10 mg three times a day with placebo as an adjunct to the usual benzodiazepine regimen. In the planned outpatient arm, we will also compare a 2-day preload of baclofen 10 mg three times a day with placebo. Ratings of GHB/GBL withdrawal, sleep, depression, anxiety as well as GHB/GBL use will be collected. The main data analyses will be descriptive about recruitment and characterising the impact of adding baclofen to the usual benzodiazepine regimen on measures and outcomes of GHB/GBL withdrawal to provide estimates of variability and effect size. A qualitative approach will evaluate research participant and clinician acceptability and data collected to inform cost-effectiveness.

          Discussion

          This feasibility study will inform a randomised controlled trial to establish whether adding baclofen to a benzodiazepine regimen reduces the severity and complications of GHB/GBL withdrawal.

          Trial registration

          ISRCTN59911189. Registered 14 October 2015. Protocol: v3.1, 1 February 2016

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Assessment of alcohol withdrawal: the revised clinical institute withdrawal assessment for alcohol scale (CIWA-Ar).

            A shortened 10-item scale for clinical quantitation of the severity of the alcohol withdrawal syndrome has been developed. This scale offers an increase in efficiency while at the same time retaining clinical usefulness, validity and reliability. It can be incorporated into the usual clinical care of patients undergoing alcohol withdrawal and into clinical drug trials of alcohol withdrawal.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Development of the Treatment Outcomes Profile.

              To develop the Treatment Outcomes Profile (TOP), a new instrument for monitoring substance misuse treatment. Prospective cohort, psychometric evaluation with 7-day retest and 1-month follow-up to assess inter-rater reliability, concurrent, discriminant and construct validity, and change sensitivity. A sample of 1021 service users, aged 16-62 years. Recruitment from 63 treatment agencies in England, collectively providing opioid substitution treatment, psychosocial interventions, in-patient detoxification and residential rehabilitation. Thirty-eight frequency, rating scale and period prevalence measures, with 28-day recall, across substance use, health, crime and social functioning domains, administered as personal interview by 163 treatment keyworkers. Twenty outcome measures met inter-rater reliability criteria: days used alcohol, opioids, crack cocaine, cocaine powder, amphetamines, cannabis and one other named substance; days injected and period prevalence of direct or indirect needle/syringe sharing; subjective rating of physical and psychological health; days committed shop theft and drug selling, period prevalence of vehicle, property, fraud/forgery and assault/violence offences; rating of quality of life; days worked and attended for education/training; and period prevalence of acute housing problems and risk of eviction. Intraclass correlation coefficients for scale measures and Cohen's kappa for dichotomous measures reached or exceeded 0.75 and 0.61, respectively. There were satisfactory validity assessments and change sensitivity of scale items judged by effect size and smallest detectable difference. The TOP clinical tool contains an additional 10 items for individual treatment planning and review. The TOP is a reliable and valid 20-item instrument for treatment outcomes monitoring.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                0207 594 8682 , anne.lingford-hughes@imperial.ac.uk , anne.lingford-hughes@ic.ac.uk
                dryash2002@gmail.com
                owen.bowdenjones@nhs.net
                m.crawford@imperial.ac.uk
                Paul.Dargan@gstt.nhs.uk
                fabiana.gordon@imperial.ac.uk
                steve.parrott@york.ac.uk
                t.weaver@mdx.ac.uk
                David.Wood@gstt.nhs.uk
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                27 September 2016
                27 September 2016
                2016
                : 17
                : 472
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Central North West London NHS Foundation Trust’s Club Drug Clinic, 69 Warwick Rd, London, SW5 9HB UK
                [2 ]Centre for Psychiatry, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Burlington Danes Building, Hammersmith Hospital site, Du Cane Rd, London, W12 0NN UK
                [3 ]Guy’s and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
                [4 ]Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College, London, UK
                [5 ]Statistical Advisory Service, School Of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
                [6 ]Department of Health Sciences, The University of York, York, UK
                [7 ]Department of Mental Health, Social Work and Integrative Medicine, Middlesex University, London, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-3453
                Article
                1593
                10.1186/s13063-016-1593-9
                5039898
                27677382
                e68f3147-8f48-464b-821e-9752a9630636
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 5 April 2016
                : 27 July 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272, National Institute for Health Research;
                Award ID: PB-PG-0212-27068
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Medicine
                ghb,gamma-hydroxybutyrate,gbl,gamma-butyrolactone,ghb/gbl withdrawal,baclofen,benzodiazepine,gabab,ghb/gbl dependence

                Comments

                Comment on this article